Grootste restaurantaanbod van Nederland
Gedetailleerde restaurantinformatie
Gemakkelijk te reserveren voor groepen
dinnersite
De complete restaurantgids!
INLOGGEN / AANMELDEN
RESTAURATEURS

Prinses Mariannelaan 71, Voorburg52.064128304.35294540Frans

toon telefoonnummer

website
(stap 1/2)
Zeker van een tafel
Binnen 5 seconden bevestigd
In twee stappen gereserveerd
Genieten, de basis van een gezellige en geslaagde middag of avond. Villa la Ruche is de plek om te genieten en wij willen dat graag voor u verzorgen.

keuken:

Frans

Prijzen:

VHN: € 60,00

diner:

ma
di
wo
do
vr
za
zo

lunch:

ma
di
wo
do
vr
za
zo

kerst:

1e Kerstdag: lunch; diner
2e Kerstdag: lunch; diner
31 december: diner
1 januari: diner

Geopend sinds:

december 1983

reserveren:

gewenst

Chefkok:

Marko Karelse

sommelier:

Eva Vonk

gastheer/vrouw:

Eva Vonk

Betaalmogelijkheden

PINMastercardVisaAmerican Express

Gesproken talen:

Nederlands, English, Deutsch, Français

Talen menukaart:

Nederlands

Aangesloten bij

GaultMillau

16 punten

Ambiance

luxe

Muziek

klassiek

Parkeren

Gratis parkeren

openbaar vervoer

Bus: 23
Tram: 10
Dichtstbijzijnde treinstation: `Voorburg`op 400 meter

Invalidevoorzieningen

Rolstoeltoegankelijk

Divers


Bar aanwezig
Airconditioned
honden toegestaan

Groepsfaciliteiten

Groepen tot 50 personen 

diëten

Dieetwensen vooraf melden, glutenvrij, koemelkvrij, zoutloos, montigniac, koolhydraatarm, suikervrij 

terras

30 plaatsen, parasols aanwezig, Tuin 

 



Reviews over Villa La Ruche



8.8

Reviews op Couverts


Dinnersite.nl toont de reviews van Couverts.nl, omdat deze geschreven zijn door gasten die daadwerkelijk het restaurant hebben bezocht.


10.0
Gemiddelde
Wouter en Ineke
3 december 2016
.feestje
Wat een fantastische avond zo voortreffelijke bediening voor 32 mensen ,een aanrader als je iets wil vieren met prachtig eten in een perfecte ambiance


8.3
Gemiddelde
Edmond
3 december 2016
Wat een gastronomische topper
Fantasierijk, origineel, verfijnd. Met kunde gebruikte, niet perse dure, ingredienten ( spitskool). Er worden hier wonderen verricht! Wat een genoegen om hier het 7 gangetjes verrassingsmenu te kunnen proeven. Met het aangepaste wijnarrangement voor de minder drinkende gast. Leuke interessante wijnkeuzes! Uitstekende staf. Het bijzondere, 7 jaar bestaan wordt gevierd, 7 gangetjes menu wordt nog tot eind december 2016 geserveerd. Het geeft een gevuld gevoel, maar het is voor die ene keer met deze kwaliteit een toegestane zonde. Wat een vakmanschap. Eerste prijs van JRE behaald hoorden wij. Terecht denk ik. Een kritische noot over de prijs van het wijnarrangement: dat is te duur! Home Library People Groups Blogs NATUREJOBS Search Scitable Register | Sign In Paleontology and Primate Evolution Paleontology and Primate Evolution | Lead Editor: Kieran McNulty PALEONTOLOGY AND PRIMATE EVOLUTION Primate Locomotion By: Daniel L. Gebo © 2013 Nature Education Citation: Gebo, D. L. (2013) Primate Locomotion. Nature Education Knowledge 4(8):1 Share Using Reddit StumbleUpon Share with Google+ Share with Twitter Share with Facebook Email Print Bookmark Primate locomotion is the study of movements and postures in arboreal and terrestrial environments. Primates are masters of life in the trees, primarily due to their grasping hands and feet. Aa Aa Aa Gebo banner. Life in the trees requires a constant stream of body adjustments (Figure 1). Primates are fantastic leapers (Figure 2), swift arboreal quadrupeds, arm-swingers, and vertical clingers. In fact, primates possess one of the most varied movement arrays of all mammals. As a group, primates are hind-limb dominated. They utilize a diagonal couplet gait and they tend to bend their elbows and knees (Figure 3) as they move along branches (Hildebrand, 1967; Napier, 1967; Martin, 1972; Kimura et al., 1979; Rollinson & Martin, 1988; Demes et al., 1994; Schmitt, 1995; Larson, 1998, Larson et al., 2001; Cartmill et al., 2002). All of these characteristics help maintain balance along a curved surface. Despite what is written in most introductory textbooks, primate bodies are not generalized but are in fact quite specialized for life in the trees. A dwarf lemur, Cheirogaleus medius, grasping and balancing along a small horizontal branch. Figure 1: A dwarf lemur, Cheirogaleus medius, grasping and balancing along a small horizontal branch. © 2013 Nature Education Courtesy of David Haring, Duke Lemur Center. All rights reserved. View Terms of Use A leaping sifaka, Propithecus verreauxi. Figure 2: A leaping sifaka, Propithecus verreauxi. © 2013 Nature Education Courtesy of David Haring, Duke Lemur Center. All rights reserved. View Terms of Use A slow loris, Nycticebus coucang, moving quadrupedally with bent elbows and knees. Figure 3: A slow loris, Nycticebus coucang, moving quadrupedally with bent elbows and knees. © 2013 Nature Education Courtesy of David Haring, Duke Lemur Center. All rights reserved. View Terms of Use Positional behavior is the term primatologists use to describe body postures with movements (see Prost, 1965; Rose, 1973, 1974; Hunt et al. 1996 for a list of postures and movements). Most postures are quite static. For example, sitting (Figure 4), standing, or lying down (Figure 5) are frequently observed among living primate postural patterns. These are often described as resting postures. Postures such as cantilevering, vertical clinging, tail suspension, or foot hanging (Figure 6), which are associated with specific species, are often linked to obtaining food. A few body adaptations, for example prehensile tails, arm-hanging anatomy, and ischial callosities, are associated with a primate posture, but most are not. In contrast, primate locomotion is body-active relative to postures, and thus musculoskeletal anatomy is more often associated with movement adaptations (for example, the long legs of leaping primates). Sitting and feeding by a dwarf lemur, Cheirogaleus medius. Figure 4: Sitting and feeding by a dwarf lemur, Cheirogaleus medius. © 2013 Nature Education Courtesy of David Haring, Duke Lemur Center. All rights reserved. View Terms of Use Lying down and feeding by a mouse lemur, Mirza coquereli. Figure 5: Lying down and feeding by a mouse lemur, Mirza coquereli. © 2013 Nature Education Courtesy of David Haring, Duke Lemur Center. All rights reserved. View Terms of Use Foot hanging by a sifaka, Propithecus verreauxi. Figure 6: Foot hanging by a sifaka, Propithecus verreauxi. © 2013 Nature Education All rights reserved. View Terms of Use Body size is a complicated variable across primate locomotor studies (Napier, 1968; Fleagle & Mittermeier, 1980; Gebo & Chapman, 1995; McGraw, 1998; Fleagle, 1999). Size patterns can be taxonomically constrained while comparisons across groups show odd patterns. For example, there are small and large leaping primates as well as small and large brachiators. The same can be said concerning quadrupedalists, whether arboreal or terrestrial. These observations suggest that primatologists have been unable to universally explain how size affects primate locomotion. We can say that 1) larger primates are at greater risk to injury if they fall relative to smaller primates; 2) frequent leaping seems to disappear above 10 kg, and the best primate leapers tend to be small; and 3) climbing is universal across primates, no matter their size. Body size relative to substrate size or gaps in the canopy does link ecology with primate locomotion. Small primates see more gaps in the canopy than large primates. Small branches are relatively tiny compared to large primates and obviously not capable of supporting heavy weights. In contrast, tree trunks are wide substrates that smaller primates cannot effectively grasp (Cartmill, 1974). Here, body size and the selection of body supports are correlated and species that choose to be exceptions evolve adaptations for these specific habitats (i.e., the claw-like nails of the trunk-clinging callithrichines). In terms of overall tree use, no matter the size of primates, they often divide the top, middle, and lower regions of trees among species to minimize feeding competition with other sympatric primates (Charles-Dominique, 1977). Primate Grasping Grasping is the hallmark adaptation among primate limbs (LeGros Clark, 1959; Cartmill, 1974, 1985; Szalay and Dagosto, 1988; Lewis, 1989). The ability to hold onto small curved surfaces (i.e., tiny branches) has allowed primates to explore the arboreal canopy in great detail. Primates have nails instead of claws, several large intrinsic and extrinsic muscles devoted to digital flexion and grasping, and mobile joint surfaces that allow hand and foot rotations. They also have an opposable first digit as well as wide fingers and toes with broad palms or soles. This greater surface-area contact with arboreal substrates adds stability during arboreal locomotion (Cartmill, 1979). All are key components in grasping. Palmigrade hands are the active grasping and climbing structures for primates but primate hands reflect a variety of postural types including palmigrade, digitigrade, knuckle-walking, fist-walking, and suspensory hand positions. Fist-walking and knuckle-walking hands allow orangutans and the African apes to fold their long fingers underneath as they move quadrupedally, usually terrestrially (Tuttle, 1967; Susman, 1974). Primates also use their hands to procure and eat their food. Reaching, grasping, and pulling items to the mouth add another dimension to primate hand adaptations (Napier, 1980; Hamrick, 1998, 2001; Schmitt and Lemelin, 2002). This feeding adaptation has figured prominently in the visual predation hypothesis of Cartmill (1972). The secondary evolution of claw-like nails among a variety of different primates (Phaner, a cheirogaleid, Euoticus, a galagid, and callitrichines, New World monkeys) has been tied to both the ecological use of large-diameter trunks — a substrate situation that exceeds the grasping span of hands and feet (Cartmill, 1979) — and to exudate feeding (Charles-Dominique, 1977; Garber, 1992). Climbing Climbing, like grasping, is an ancient arboreal adaptation for primates. Moving up vertical substrates is well documented across all primates, although quantitative studies have shown that climbing is not a particularly frequent movement in any locomotor profile (Gebo, 1996). Leaping, quadrupedalism, or brachiation dominate these profiles. Primates clearly need to climb upward in trees but relative to all other movement types, vertical climbing is not frequent relative to the traveling modes of locomotion. Among climbing primates, apes with their long arms are recorded to be frequent vertical climbers when arboreal, but forelimb lengthening along with their highly modified upper body is likely an adaptation from their arm-swinging ancestry. Some researchers like to divide climbing into two locomotor categories: vertical climbing and clambering. In this scheme, climbing is restricted to ascending or descending a vertical support whereas clambering is moving obliquely through a network of smaller branches. They differ in the angle of the climb and in the supports on which primates move upward. Clambering is more common among primates than vertical climbing. Bridging is an unusual movement pattern often associated with climbing movements. Here, a primate stretches across a gap and pulls itself to the branch on the other side. Lorises, atelines, and oranguatans often use this technique to cross gaps in the canopy. Quadrupedalism Quadrupedalism can be divided into arboreal (the most common) and terrestrial versions. Quadrupedal primates have fore- and hind limbs of relatively equal length and they tend to lower their centers of gravity toward the branch (Napier, 1967; Larson, 1998) by bending their elbows and knees (Schmitt, 1995). The use of diagonal couplets allows primates to have only a single limb off the substrate at any given time. Arboreal quadrupedal primates supinate their hands and feet toward the curve of the support (palmigrade support). Terrestrial quadrupedal primates have similar fore and hind limb lengths, but these primates (mostly Old World monkeys) have greatly reduced joint mobility throughout their limbs and they utilize more pronated hand positions. Terrestral quadrupedalism can be subdivided into digitigrade, knuckle-walking, and fist-walking types. The African apes utilize terrestrial quadrupedalism with fingers folded at the first joint (knuckle-walking), and exhibiting longer arms than legs and a back angled at 45 degrees. Orangutans move with a fist-walking hand posture (fingers entirely closed in a fist) and often highly supinated foot positions. Terrestrial Old World monkeys are often digitigrade with their hand positions. Leaping Primates that leap come in two basic varieties. Strepsirhine primates (e.g., lemurs and galagos) and tarsiers are known for their forceful upward parabolic leaps, while anthropoids tend to leap outward along a horizontal plane and then fall downward. Both can leap frequently, although size tends to be limiting. For example, there are few frequent leaping primates above 10 kg. Elongated legs help leapers increase height and distance, producing leaps with less relative muscle force (Hall-Craggs, 1965). All leapers have long femora, but it is the anatomy of the knee, with its tall antero-posterior height and the high lateral patellar rim, that separates the occasional versus the habitual leaper. As one might expect, the muscles of the quadriceps are huge in these animals to produce the necessary leg force for extension to move these primates across canopy gaps quickly and efficiently. Tarsiers have the most extreme hind limbs with tibio-fibular fusion and greatly elongated foot bones. Galagos as well have significantly increased foot length by elongating their foot bones, thereby achieving longer legs and ultimately better lever mechanics. Morton (1924) argued that the reason primates elongated the calcaneus and the navicular bones higher up in the foot instead of their more distal metatarsals is a morphological compromise between the mechanical demands of leaping and grasping. Although long lever arms (i.e., long feet) help produce better gear ratios for greater leaping distances, the feet of arboreal primates must also be able to grasp. By elongating the calcaneus and the navicular, tarsiers and galagos have been able to maintain mobility toward the digits while greatly increasing foot length. Brachiation Arm-swinging and arm hanging is a very peculiar primate movement/posture relative to hind limb dominated primates, and it evolved at least twice: in apes and in spider monkeys. The upper body of living apes (including humans) is quite different from those of other primates. All of these upper body features are related to brachiation and arm suspension (Keith, 1923; Washburn, 1968; Gebo, 1996). In apes, the thorax is broad and flattened antero-posteriorly. This is an orthograde or an erect back relative to the common pronograde or horizontal backs of primates. Here, the shoulders are pushed out to the sides of the body with scapulae lying on the back wall rather than along the sides of the rib cage as in quadrupedal primates. This new scapular position forces the shoulder joints to the sides of the body and away from the midline, thereby increasing rotational mobility of the arm. The clavicle is long to reach the new shoulder position. The forelimb is very long overall, thereby increasing stride length (or arm-swing in this case). The lateral position of the shoulder joint constrains the enlarged humeral head joint to twist (medial torsion) to articulate with the lateral facing scapula, thereby allowing the elbow to face forward. The elbow joint morphology of the living apes allows both large rotational movements and large flexion-extension movements (Rose, 1988). In fact, the olecranon process of the ulna is greatly shortened among apes, allowing for full extension at the elbow joint, an unusual ability relative to other primates, but a necessary condition for a fully extended arm during hanging. The forelimb bones are long among apes, especially in gibbons. At the wrist, apes have increased abduction (Lewis, 1969, 1989), and ape fingers are very long and hook-like relative to other non-swinging primates. Glossary arboreal quadrupeds: primates that use all four limbs to move through trees brachiators: arm-swinging primates bridging: a movement that stretches the body across a spatial gap while holding onto to two opposing branches canopy: the upward branches of trees cantilevering: grasping a branch with only the feet while stretching outward with the hands, normally to catch insects clambering: climbing obliquely upward through a network of smaller branches diagonal couplet gait: locomotion using the following sequence of appendages-right hand, left foot, left hand, and right foot digitigrade: walking on fingers and toes exudate: tree gum or tree sap hind-limb dominated: forward propulsion using more force from hind limbs than from forelimbs ischial callosities: a flattened bony end of the ischium (back side of the pelvis) olecranon process: the proximal end of the ulna (elbow region), where the triceps muscle attaches orthograde: an erect or a vertical body position palmigrade: all parts of the palm of a hand are flat against a substrate during locomotion positional behavior: combination of movements and postures in a species pronated: to rotate the hand medially or palm down pronograde: a horizontal body position quadriceps: the muscles of the thigh substrate: the surface across which an animal moves. This could be a branch or the ground. supinate: to rotate the hand laterally or on its back surface sympatric: species that live within the same area vertical clinger: species that hold onto or cling to a vertical support, usually a tree trunk References and Recommended Reading Cartmill, M. Arboreal adaptations and the origin of the order Primates. In The Functional and Evolutionary Biology of Primates. Ed. Tuttle, R.H. (Chicago: Aldine Press 1972). 97-122. Cartmill, M. Pads and claws in arboreal locomotion. In Primate Locomotion. Ed. Jenkins, J.A. (New York: Academic Press 1974). 45-83. Cartmill, M. The volar skin of primates: its frictional characteristics and their functional significance. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 50, 497-510 (1979). Cartmill, M. Climbing. In Functional Vertebrate Morphology. Eds. Hildebrand, M., Bramble, D.M. et al. (Cambridge: Belknap Press 1985). 73-88. Cartmill, M., Lemelin P., & Schmitt, D.O. Support polygons and symmetrical gaits in mammals. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 136, 401-420 (2002). Charles-Dominique, P. Ecology and Behaviour of Nocturnal Primates. New York: Columbia University Press (1977). Demes, B., Larson S. G., et al. The kinetics of primate quadrupedalism: "hindlimb drive" reconsidered. Journal of Human Evolution 26, 353-374 (1994). Fleagle, J. G. Primate Adaptation and Evolution. New York: Academic Press (1999). Fleagle, J. G. & Mittermeier, R. A. Locomotor behavior, body size, and comparative ecology of seven Surinam monkeys. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 52, 301-314 (1980). Garber, P. A. Vertical clinging, small body size, and the evolution of feeding adaptation in the Callitrichinae. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 88, 469-482 (1992). Gebo, D. L. Climbing, brachiation, and terrestrial quadrupedalism: historical precursors of hominid bipedalism. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 101, 55-92 (1996). Gebo, D. L. & Chapman, C. A. Positional behavior in five sympatric Old World Monkeys. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 97, 49-76 (1995). Hall-Craggs, E. C. B. An analysis of the jump of the lesser galago. Journal of Zoology London 147, 20-29 (1965). Hamrick, M. W. Functional and adaptive significance of primate pads and claws: evidence for New World anthropoids. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 106, 113-127 (1998). Hamrick, M. W. Primate origins: evolutionary change in digital ray patterning and segmentation. Journal of Human Evolution 40, 339-351 (2001). Hildebrand, M. Symmetrical gaits of primates. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 26, 119-130 (1967). Hunt, K. D., Cant, J. G. H. et al. Standardized descriptions of primate locomotor and postural modes. Primates 37(4), 363-387 (1996). Keith, A. Man's Posture: its evolution and disorders. British Medical Journal 1, 451-454, 545-548, 587-590, 624-626, 669-672 (1923). Kimura, T., Okada, M. & Ishida, H. Kinesiological characteristics of primate walking: its significance in human walking. In Environment, Behavior and Morphology: Dynamic Interactions in Primates. Eds. Morbeck, M.E. et al. (New York: Gustav Fischer 1979). 297-311. Larson, S. G. Unique aspects of quadrupedal locomotion in nonhuman primates. In Primate Locomotion: Recent Advances. Eds. Strasser, E. et al. (New York: Plenum Press 1998). 157-173. Larson, S. G. et al. Limb excursion during quadrupedal walking: how do primates compare to other mammals. Journal of Zoology London 255, 353-365 (2001). Le Gros Clark, W. E. The Antecedents of Man: An Introduction to the Evolution of Primates. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Press (1959). Lewis, O. J. The hominoid wrist joint. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 30, 251-268 (1969). Lewis, O. J. Functional Morphology of the Evolving Hand and Foot. Oxford: Oxford Science Publications (1989). Martin, R. D. Adaptive radiation and behavior of the Malagasy lemurs. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (Biology) 264, 295-352 (1972). McGraw, W. S. Comparative locomotion and habitat use of six monkeys in the Tai Forest, Ivory Coast. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 105, 493-510 (1998). Morton, D. J. The evolution of the human foot, part II. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 1, 1-52 (1924). Napier, J. R. Evolutionary aspects of primate locomotion. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 27, 333-342 (1967). Napier, J. R. Evolutionary aspects of primate locomotion. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 27, 333-342 (1968). Napier, J. R. Hands. New York: Pantheon Books (1980). Prost, J. H. A definitional system for the classification of primate locomotion. American Anthropologist 67, 1198-1214 (1965) Rollinson, J. & Martin, R. D. Comparative aspects of primate locomotion, with special reference to arboreal cercopithecines. Symposium of the Zoological Society London 48, 377-427 (1981). Rose, M. D. Quadrupedalism in primates. Primates 14, 337-357 (1973). Rose, M. D. Postural adaptations in New and Old World monkeys. In Primate Locomotion. Ed. Jenkins, F.A. (New York: Academic Press 1974). 201-222. Rose, M. D. Another look at the anthropoid elbow. Journal of Human Evolution 17, 193-224 (1988). Schmitt, D. A kinematic and kinetic analysis of forelimb use during arboreal and terrestrial quadrupedalism in Old World monkeys. PhD. Dissertation, SUNY at Stony Brook (1995). Schmitt, D. & Lemelin, P. Origins of primate locomotion: gait mechanics of the woolly opossum. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 118, 231-238 (2002). Susman, R. L. Facultative terrestrial hand postures in an orangutan and pongid evolution. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 40, 27-38 (1974). Szalay, F. S. & Dagosto, M. Evolution of hallucial grasping in the primates. Journal of Human Evolution 17, 1-33 (1988). Tuttle, R. H. Knuckle-walking and the evolution of hominoid hands. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 26, 171-206 (1967). Washburn, S. L. The Study of Human Evolution (Congdon Lectures). Eugene: University of Oregon Books (1968). Outline | Keywords FeedBack Share Using Reddit StumbleUpon Share with Google+ Share with Twitter Share with Facebook Email Print Bookmark Explore This Subject BASIC Characteristics of Crown Primates Dating Rocks and Fossils Using Geologic Methods How to Become a Primate Fossil ADVANCED Primate Cranial Diversity Primate Origins and the Plesiadapiforms INTERMEDIATE Effects of Climate Change on Primate Evolution in the Cenozoic Hominoid Origins Primate Locomotion Primate Teeth and Plant Fracture Properties Updates New post in Green Science: I leave and heave a sigh and say goodbye New post in Saltwater Science: Thanks for the good times! New topic in Women in Science: Where to find Laura Hoopes' Women in Science future thoughts? New post in Saltwater Science: Microplastic in the ocean New topic in Women in Science: LAB GIRL, exciting new woman-in-science biography Topic Rooms Within this Subject (9) Basic (3) Intermediate (4) Advanced (2) Other Topic Rooms Ecology Evolution Ecosystem Ecology Physiological Ecology Population Ecology Community Ecology Global and Regional Ecology Conservation and Restoration Animal Behavior Teach Ecology Earth Systems Earth's Climate: Past, Present, and Future Terrestrial Geosystems Marine Geosystems Soil, Agriculture, and Agricultural Biotechnology Environmental Ethics Biological Anthropology Scientific Underpinnings Paleontology and Primate Evolution Human Fossil Record The Living Primates Connect Connect Blogs Student Voices Student Voices Creature Cast Creature Cast NatureEdCast NatureEdCast Simply Science Simply Science « Prev Next » © 2014 Nature EducationAbout| Contact| Press Room| Sponsors| Terms of Use| Privacy Notice| Glossary| Catalog| Home| Library| People| Groups| Blogs


8.6
Gemiddelde
Henk
1 december 2016
Sterrenrestaurant in wording
Als het restaurant op een koude woensdagavond nagenoeg vol zit, zegt dat al heel wat. En terecht. We waren met 4 personen en het ontbrak aan niets. Kwaliteit alom; bijzonder charmante en kundige bediening, en wat een mooie gerechten. Kunnen zo in een sterrenzaak gemaakt zijn. De gang zat er ook goed in dus niet eeuwig wachten. De leuke dames in de bediening hielden alles in de gaten. Mooie wijnkaart ook trouwens. Gezellig en goed dineren, wat wil je nog meer. Veel beter dan buurtgenoot Ron Blaauw met zijn Central Park en houten stoelen in een grote zaal. Ik denk dat vele klantjes van de vroegere Henk Savelberg nu hier dineren. En terecht.


Meer reviews »


Schrijf zelf een review »


Lekker gegeten? Laat het weten!





Updates van dinnersite ontvangen?

Blijf op de hoogte van de laatste nieuwtjes en restaurants bij jou in de buurt.